The truth about global warming

The truth about global warming


. MARK: HELLO, AMERICA. I’M MARK LEVIN. THIS IS “LIFE, LIBERTY & LEVIN.” WELCOME.>>NICE TO SEE YOU.>>IT’S A GREAT HONOR TO SEE YOU, PATRICK MICHAELS. DOCTOR. EXPERT ON ALL THINGS CLIMATE AND ENVIRONMENT AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED. LITTLE BIT OF YOUR BACKGROUND. DIRECTOR OF THE STUDY OF SCIENCE AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. YOU HOLD AN AB IN SM, YOU HOLD THOSE DEGREES IN BIOLOGY, SCIENCES AND PLANT ECOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. PRETTY GOOD SCHOOL. Ph.D. IN ECOLOGICAL CLIMATOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN IN MADISON, 1979. PRESIDENT OF THE STATE CLIMATOLOGISTS, PROGRAM CHAIRMAN FOR THE CITY OF APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY OF THE AMERICAN METEORLOGICAL SOCIETY. SAY THAT FAST FIVE TIMES. RESEARCH PROFESSOR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOR 30 YEARS, AND GIVING EXPANSIVE BACKGROUND THAT YOU HAVE, GIVING THAT TO THE PUBLIC SO THEY THAT YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. YOU’RE A CONTRIBUTING AUTHOR AND REVIEWER OF THE UNITED NATIONS INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL PANEL OF CLIMATE CHANGE. WE’VE HEARD IT ALL. WHAT’S GOING ON OUT THERE?>>WELL, SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE PLANET IS WARMER THAN IT WAS 100 YEARS AGO ABOUT. 9/10th OF A DEGREE CELSIUS. MARK: 9/10th DEGREE OF CELSIUS IS THAT A LOT?>>NO. COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY HUMAN BEINGS, WE HAVEN’T PUT ENOUGH CO2 IN THE AIR, AND ONE IN THE LATER PART OF THE 20th CENTURY THAT SLOWS DOWN OR DEPENDS WHOSE DATA YOU USE ONLY TO RESUME WITH THE BIG EL NINO THAT COVERED THE NEWS THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS. THAT MEANS THAT PROBABLY HALF, MAYBE HALF OF THAT NINE-TENTHS OF THE DEGREE MIGHT BE CAUSED BY GREENHOUSE GASES. WHEN THE PLANET WARMED BEGINNING 1976, THE TEMPERATURE OF THE STRATOSPHERE STARTED TO STOP, THAT’S THE PREDICTION OF GREENHOUSE THEORY THAT’S NOT INTUITIVE. THE GREAT PHILOSOPHER OF SCIENCE CARL POPPER SAID IF YOU CAN MEET A DIFFICULT PREDICTION WITH YOUR THEORY, YOU CAN CONTINUE TO ENTERTAIN YOUR THEORY. SO THE THEORY IS RIGHT, BUT THE APPLICATION OF IT IS WRONG. IT IS NOWHERE NEAR AS WARM AS IT’S SUPPOSED TO BE. THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE MAKING SYSTEMATIC, DRAMATIC ERRORS OVER THE ENTIRE TROPICS WHICH IS 40% OF THE EARTH, AND IT’S WHERE ALL OUR MOISTURE COMES FROM. ALMOST ALL OF IT. MARK: LET ME STOP YOU THERE. WHO DOES THESE COMPUTER MODELS?>>GOVERNMENTS. THERE ARE 32 FAMILIES OF COMPUTER MODELS THAT ARE USED BY THE UNITED NATIONS. EACH GOVERNMENT SPONSORED. AND ALL OF THEM ARE PREDICTING FAR, FAR TOO MUCH WARMING. THE DISPARITY BETWEEN WHAT’S BEEN PREDICTED TO HAPPEN, WHICH LOOKS LIKE SDMSHGS WHAT IS HAPPENING CONTINUES TO GROW. MARK: WE KNOW THAT FOR A FACT?>>YEAH, YOU COULD JUST LOOK AT THE WEATHER BALLOON TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT THE SATELLITE TEMPERATURES. YOU CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING CALLED THE REANALYSIS DATA. THEY BEHAVE IN CONCERT. THEY’RE SHOWING THE SAME THING, AND THE SAME THING IS A LOT DIFFERENT THAN THIS THING. HOWEVER, WE NEED TO CALL THE SPECIAL COUNSEL. MARK: SPECIAL COUNSEL?>>YES, BECAUSE ONE MODEL WORKS. YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS? IT’S THE RUSSIAN MODEL. MARK: LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT. SO ALL THE GOVERNMENT MODELS ARE LIKE THIS?>>YEAH. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL LIKE THIS.>>YEAH. THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING IN IT. MARK: THE RUSSIAN MODEL HAS THE LEAST WARMING AND PRETTY MUCH FOLLOWS REALITY. WHAT’S BEEN TESTED OVER A FEW DECADES.>>YEAH, CORRECT. IF WE WERE RATIONAL ABOUT THIS, THINK ABOUT THE DAILY WEATHER FORECAST. YOU WATCH THE WEATHER CHANNEL, THEY GO THIS MODEL SAYS THAT, THAT MODEL SAYS THAT, WE THINK THIS ONE IS WORKING THE BEST, WE’RE GOING TO RELY ON THAT. WELL, FOR CLIMATE FORECAST SHOULD BE USING THE RUSSIAN MODEL BUT WE’RE NOT. WE USE THIS BIG SPATE OF ALL THE OTHER MODELS THAT HAVE THE WARMING THAT’S NOT OCCURRING. MARK: WHY ARE THE OTHER MODELS, 31 OF THEM, WRONG. AND WHY DO THEY ALL GO THE SAME DIRECTION, UP?>>BECAUSE, THEY WHAT ARE IS CALLED PARAMETERIZED. THEY’RE ALL PARAMETERIZED, CAN I TRANSLATE PARAMETERIZED IN ENGLISH? FUDGE. THEY DON’T GET THE RIGHT ANSWER, DON’T KNOW THE RIGHT ANSWER FOR CERTAIN PHENOMENA, SO WE ESSENTIALLY PUT IN CODE STEPS THAT GIVE US WHAT WE THINK IT SHOULD BE. AND SYSTEMATIC ERROR THAT WAS MADE WAS THE MODELS WERE TUNED, AS IT SAID. TUNED. TUNED TO SIMULATE THE WARMING OF THE EARLY 20th CENTURY. BEGAN IN 1910, ENDED IN 1945, ABOUT .45 DEGREES CELSIUS. MARK, THAT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY CARBON DIOXIDE. MARK: BECAUSE THERE WASN’T ENOUGH.>>WE HAD TO PUT ENOUGH IN THAT THE BACKGROUND CARBON DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION IS 280 MILLION PARTS PER MILLION. WHEN THE FIRST WARMING STARTED, 208 PARTS PER MILLION. IF IT IS THAT SENSITIVE TO 18PPM CHANGE IN CO2 WE WOULDN’T BE TALKING ABOUT THIS RIGHT NOW AND WE’D BE SWEATING BULLETS.>>SO WHAT YOU’RE SAYING IS MAN MADE CARBON DIOXIDE THE LAST CENTURY COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED –>>EARLY 20th CENTURY. MARK: COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED THIS HEAT. SO WHAT DID? DO WE KNOW?>>NO. AND THREE MOST IMPORTANT WORDS IN LIFE MAY NOT BE I LOVE YOU. IT MAY BE I DON’T KNOW. I DON’T THINK ANYBODY REALLY KNOWS WHAT KICKED OFF THAT WARMING. THERE’S LOTS OF THEORIES. ONE IS THAT IT WAS THE FINAL ESCAPE FROM A GOLD PERIOD, MULTICENTURY PERIOD KNOWN AS THE LITTLE ICE AGE. THAT’S THE PLAUSIBILITY, WHY DID IT HAPPEN THEN. BUT WE DON’T HAVE A GOOD EXPLANATION FOR THAT. BECAUSE WE FORCED THE COMPUTER MODELS TO SAY, HUMAN INFLUENCE, CO2 AND OTHER STUFF. WE MADE THE MODELS TOO SENSITIVE, AND SO THAT’S WHY WHEN YOU GET TO THE LATE 20th CENTURY, ALL OF A SUDDEN THEY’RE WARMING UP LIKE CRAZY AND THE REALITY IS DOWN HERE. IT WAS GUARANTEED TO HAPPEN. THIS WAS REVEALED IN SCIENCE MAGAZINE IN LATE 2016, AND THERE WAS A PAPER PUBLISHED BY A FRENCH CLIMATE MODELER CALLED THE ART AND SCIENCE OF CLIMATE MODEL TUNING. AND IN IT, HE SPEAKS OF PARAMETERIZING. WE COULD SAY FUDGING, THE MODELS TO GIVE, HIS WORDS, AN ANTICIPATED ACCEPTABLE RANGE OF RESULTS. SO IT’S THE SCIENTIST, NOT THE SCIENCE THAT’S DETERMINING HOW MUCH IT’S GOING TO WARM. LOT OF PEOPLE DON’T KNOW THIS, BUT IT HAPPENS TO BE TRUE, AND YOU KNOW, WE COULD SPECULATE AS TO WHY THAT PAPER WAS PUBLISHED RIGHT BEFORE THE 2016 ELECTION? I WOULDN’T WANT TO IMPUTE CAUSATION, BUT GEE — MARK: BUT I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT CAUSATION.>>SURE. MARK: HAVE YOU 31 GOVERNMENTS.>>THE 31 DIFFERENT MODELS.>>31 DIFFERENT MODELS. MULTIPLE GOVERNMENTS.>>RIGHT. MARK: FUDGING THE NUMBERS?>>NOT FUDGING THEM PARAMETERIZING. MARK: YOU USED THE WORD FUDGING. DOES OUR EPA DO THAT? DOES NASA DO THAT? WHO DOES THAT FOR US?>>GOOD QUESTION, MARK, BECAUSE THE EPA WAS TOLD BY THE SUPREME COURT IN 2007 THAT IF IT FOUND THE CARBON DIOXIDE ENDANGERED HUMAN HEALTH AND WELFARE, THAT IT HAD THE POWER TO REGULATE IT UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT. MARK: THIS IS THE MASSACHUSETTS.>>THE EPA. WELL, THEY PRODUCED AN ENDANGERMENT FINDING, 2009, AND THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING FOR PROSPECTIVE CLIMATE IS 100%, I DIDN’T SAY 90%. I SAID 100% BASED ON THOSE MODELS. SO IF YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT THOSE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY ARE NOT WORKING, YOU CAN TAKE DOWN THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING, AND THAT WOULD BE THE BASIS FOR ALL THOSE POLICIES THAT CAME OUT OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION. MARK: WHICH WOULD MEAN YOU DON’T GET TO REGULATE –>>ABSOLUTELY. MARK: — CARBON DIOXIDE.>>ABSOLUTELY, THE ENDANGERMENT FINDING IS THE HEART OF THE MATTER. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA HOW GUNG HO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WAS ON THIS ISSUE. IF YOU LISTEN TO HIS FIRST INAUGURAL SPEECH, JANUARY 20, 2009, IT’S SECOND SUBSTANTIVE PARAGRAPH OF THE SPEECH IS ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING, AFTER HEALTH CARE. 90 DAYS AFTER HE FINISHED THAT SPEECH, HIS EPA PRODUCED A PRELIMINARY FINDING OF ENDANGERMENT FROM CARBON DIOXIDE. THEY WERE WORKING ON THIS BEFORE HE WAS PRESIDENT, BUREAUCRATS CAN’T WORK THAT FAST, AND THEN THE FINAL FINDING WAS MADE IN DECEMBER FOR THE CLIMATE CONFERENCE IN COPENHAGEN THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO PRODUCE ANOTHER GLOBAL WARMING. MARK: SO YOU’RE TELLING US THAT WE HAVE A MASSIVE BIT OF PUBLIC POLICY THAT HAS ENORMOUS EFFECT ON SOCIETY THAT’S BUILT ON — I’LL USE MY WORDS, PHONY MODELS.>>BUILT ON A HOUSE OF CARDS. MODELS REALLY DON’T WORK. IF I COULD REALLY BE ARCANE, I COULD EXPLAIN THE MECHANISM AS TO WHY THEY DON’T WORK. MARK: AS LONG AS I UNDERSTAND IT.>>THE MODELS SYSTEMATICALLY PREDICT THAT AS YOU GO UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE IN THE TROPICS WHICH ARE 40% OF THE EARTH THAT THE TEMPERATURE SHOULD RISE DRAMATICALLY AS YOU GO FURTHER UP IN THE ATMOSPHERE. SO WHEN YOU GET TO THE LEVEL OF THE JET STREAM, THE COMPUTER MODELS ARE PREDICTING SEVEN TIMES. I DIDN’T SAY SEVEN-TENTHS OF A DEGREE, I SAID SEVEN TIMES MORE WARMING THAN BEING OBSERVED. WHY AM I BORING YOU WITH THAT? THE VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF TEMPERATURE DETERMINES PRECIPITATION, AND GUESS WHAT? ALMOST ALL THE ATMOSPHERIC MOISTURE THAT WE HAVE AROUND US TODAY IN THE HUMID WASHINGTON, D.C., THAT COMES FROM THE TROPICS. SO IF YOU GET THAT VERTICAL MOTION WRONG, DOWN THERE, YOU GET ALL THE SUBSEQUENT VARIABLES WRONG. IT’S A FANTASTIC SYSTEMATIC ERROR, AND AGAIN, THAT ALONG WITH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SURFACE TEMPERATURES ARE RATHER THE LOWER ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURES THAN WHAT’S BEING OBSERVED, THAT’S SUFFICIENT TO THE CHEMICAL FINDING. MARK: TO THE AVERAGE PEDESTRIAN LIKE ME, IF YOU GET THAT WRONG, WHAT DOES IT MEAN? YOU GET THE WEATHER MODELS WRONG?>>THE SUBSEQUENT WEATHER WRONG. THAT’S WHY, IF YOU LOOK AT ALL THESE FAMILIES OF MODELS, THEY PREDICT RADICALLY DIFFERENT CHANGES IN PRECIPITATION FROM MODEL TO MODEL. WELL, PROBABLY BECAUSE THEY GOT THE PRECIPITATION INITIALIZATION OUT OF TROPICS WRONG. PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT. I OFFER YOU WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA, IF AN EXAMPLE PRECIPITATION IS IMPORTANT COMING FROM THE TROPICS, GET THAT WRONG AND YOU GET THAT THING.>>IS WEATHER GETTING WORSE?>>NO. I LOVE THAT QUESTION BECAUSE WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT. ROGER PILKE, JR., AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DOES. THIS YES, THERE’S MORE DAMAGE FROM WEATHER BECAUSE THERE’S MORE STUFF AND PEOPLE AND PROPERTY IN THE WAY OF WEATHER. SO WHAT YOU REALLY WANT TO LOOK AT ARE WEATHER DAMAGES AS A PERCENT OF GDP. WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT THAT WAY, THERE’S NOTHING WHATSOEVER. I’M SURE HURRICANES ARE GETTING WORSE. I HEARD THAT ON EVERY LEGACY NETWORK DURING FLORENCE AND HARVEY AND ALL THAT STUFF. WELL, FACT OF THE MATTER IS, THERE’S A GUY BY THE NAME OF RYAN MAUI, A HOT SHOT YOUNG TROPICAL METEOROLOGIST, AND A SCHOLAR AT THE CATO INSTITUTE. HE TRACKS THE ENERGY IN THE TROPICAL CYCLONES. SINCE WE GOT GLOBAL RECORDS THAT BEGAN IN 1970, AND YOU WOULD THINK THERE WOULD BE SOME RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THAT INTEGRATED ENERGY AND GLOBAL WARMING AFTER ALL, IT’S ONLY LOGICAL. VICE PRESIDENT GORE SAYS THAT MUST BE THE CASE. IT’S NOT. THERE’S NO RELATIONSHIP WHATSOEVER BETWEEN THE ACCUMULATED CYCLONE ENERGY AND THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE EARTH. IT’S JUST NOT THERE. NOW, WHAT — WAIT A MINUTE, J DOES OUR GOVERNMENT SAY THIS? THEY SAID IT IN THEIR LAST REPORT CALLED GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES. THEY SAID, OH, THERE’S BEEN A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN HURRICANE POWER IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN FROM 1970 TO 2009 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. 1980 TO 2009. WAIT A MINUTE. WHY DID YOU STOP IN 2009. IT’S 2014 REPORT. BECAUSE IF YOU TAKE THE DATA AFTER 2009, THE INCREASE GOES BACK TO WHERE IT WAS. WHY DID YOU START IN THE MID 1970s, BECAUSE WE HAVE RECORDS THAT ARE REALLY GOOD BACK TO 1920. IF YOU LOOK AT 1920 TO 1950, YOU SEE AN INCREASE THAT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE ONE THAT OCCURS. MARK: SO THE INFORMATION THEY’RE PROVIDING US –>>IS SKEWED. IT’S SKEWED. THEY’RE CHERRY PICKING. MARK: HERE WE RELY ON THE CLIMATOLOGISTS AND THEY ARE HYPERPOLITICAL. TONIGHT GET BACK TO THAT AS SOON AS WE RETURN.>>>DON’T FORGET, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, YOU CAN WATCH LEVIN TV ALMOST EVERY WEEK NIGHT BY

100 Replies to “The truth about global warming

  1. I know – most of co2 comes into atmosphere from soil and geoengineering (creating greenhouse effect) speeds up the process.

  2. ROTHSCHILD controls Geoengineering
    • aerosol Aluminum ChemTrails for every country BUT Israel
    (they add Silver iodide for FLOODING)
    • HAARP earthquakes and directing hurricanes (Zio controlled "Climate Chaos" for everywhere BUT Israel)
    • HAARP all over the World controlled by Rothschild to heat the ionosphere and cause heat waves/draught
    • tsunami nuke bombs (Jakarta/Indonesia on Boxing Day, Japan 3/11 for helping Iran enrich uranium)
    • wave blast accelerators to simulate flooding and waves
    (you shall NEVER see sea-level Israel or Dead Sea flooded)
    IMPRISON ROTHSCHILD AND ALL MINIONS you'll see only catastrophe from Mother Nature, not Zio "Climate Chaos"

  3. If you go back to the times of the Vikings when Greenland and Vinland where discovered Greenland was warmer at this time and actually possessed green pastures and farmable land hence the name Greenland, there are obviously continents under the ice and climate cycles have changed through out the beginning of earths atmosphere time and time again and the earth has healed itself. It will do the same thing again and its not because of emissions created by Co2. It's a number of things like mass density populations generating heat on a daily basis, shifting poles, solar maximum and solar minimum, war, and mass destruction of agriculture to make living space for our ever growing population.

  4. Any scientist (including myself) agree that global warming is the earth’s normal weather patterns.fluctuations occurring over geological time frames. I try to explain to others brainwashed by the politics think I’m loony. The political entities are using global warming a tool to control and tax the population

  5. humans have been burning coal for 175 years , humans have been burning oil for 125 years , where did all this carbon go ? these rich people who made their living off of it for decades got it hidden in their pockets with their cash ?

  6. Why would anyone trust something this important to those in government who are, in total,no smarter than the rest of us? I believe in a higher power, not a higher man, or men who seek to convince by consensus rather than empirical science. Does anyone remember the sleeping lion beneath the tree who was startled awake by a falling object from the tree. He panicked and assumed the earth was falling, so he ran around screaming this, and since he was the 'mighty lion'
    everyone feared him and were afraid to refute him, out loud. So he created one hell of mess until reality showed him to be just a scarty-cat old lion, who wasn't smart enough to get rich off 'his' reality!

  7. I cant wait until trump wins 2020 , between the dems wailing and crying temps will rise and sea level will drown us all 😉

  8. I remember the first time I heard mark on the radio. It sounded lick he was screaming into the mic!!
    I understood why.
    He is so layed back and relaxed now, in comparison

  9. Fake News. Funny that Fox News will invite someone from Cato institute when they know that person agrees with the Repubelican narratives. They ignore other studies by Cato when they don’t sit well with the Trumpians.

  10. DID AOC EVER WATCH THIS VIDEO?!!!! I think she needs too so she can sleep at night, she’s till convinced the world will end in 12 years.

  11. It all comes down to the wealthy corporations in coal, oil, chemical, garbage disposal, and others, they refuse to admit their factories produce enough pollution to effect the world even if production is at 100% 24/7 for a billions. But they are the biggest donors to presidential and congressional campaigns. Then politicians with no scientific background in any scientific field comes out and says every scientists is wrong. And that's due to the threat the company made and with a large size check and a position with the company when the puppet leaves office. The difference between religion and science, is science has evidence,

  12. Green fund. Thank God, President Trump refused to pay this group the BILLIONS of dollars Obama wanted us to pay. The Green Fund… is literally doing NOTHING to find the answers to the problems they say we have. Strangely, corporations who really do contribute all kinds of pollutants don't take any blame… it's you and me, the common people who they're all blaming. Anyone see the psychotic logic here? The Green Fund will build Dam's, electrical infrastructure in Africa… so, we're still paying for our Dam's and electrical infrastructure, why should we, the American Taxpayer pay for the Dams and infrastructure in nations who are wealthy but the dictators refuse to build the dams and electrical infrastructure??? Anyone??

  13. Expert? More like clown and charlatan.
    And this has consequences, as published by the Cato Institute: The Cato Institute in Washington, D.C., quietly shut down a program that for years sought to raise uncertainty about climate science, leaving the libertarian think tank co-founded by Charles Koch without an office dedicated to global warming.

  14. It's common sense that the exhaust emitting from my car everyday for the past 60 years has to go somewhere within the atmosphere. This man sounds unsure and isn't convincing. I think this is a "paid for" Interview.

  15. Why has not one single prediction from the climate change scientist came true? Ocean levels, polar ice caps; they're all the same.

  16. The Cato Institute exists for developing deliberate distortions and fake news. If Fox thinks this is a legitimate debate about climate change, then that speaks volumes about their own credibility.

  17. Point of privilege! Please stop posting videos like this! I'm prone to sensory overload and I just made an aggressive scent!

  18. There is big money to be made from global warming. Illegally made money. That's why the crooked democrats like Clinton and Obama push for it.

  19. I wish that all the scientists who do not agree with global warming would band together and publicly own it. Take the wind out of the sails of the left so they cannot use this anymore for the destructive policies they want to put into affect.

  20. Pseudoscience not science is used to feed “global warming” theory that serves a political agenda for a “global” government or future NWO…(only sleepy people believe in that made up story) Wake up…

  21. Great Great, Love Levin, One of the Smartest Guys Around. However, People Need to Stop Denying Their Own Eyes and Basic Science and Start Talking About The Fact That Your Getting Sprayed Almost Everyday Like Bugs. The Weather Has Been Being Modified for Quite Some Time Now, Not By Pollution, By Deliberate Spraying of Aerosols Into the Upper Atmosphere in Concert With Other Technologies. The Evidence Is Overwhelming for Those Who Look It Up, Look Up and Get Real With It.

  22. To stop Climate change. Don’t fly. Don’t drive. Don’t eat meat. Don’t fart. Don’t pick your nose. Don’t send Rocket to the moon. Stop making fire works. Stop breathing. Better still just. Die .

  23. So all the Plastics and Garbage the Human race dumps into the Oceans and all the Rainforest being cut down aren’t effecting our Planet? Nothing like procrastinating until it’s to late. Gotta love the Human race. Come on, we have got to be causing damage to this planet. For every expert who says we aren’t causing damage you can find another one why says we are causing damage. Use common sense folks. You can’t continue to abuse the Planet and use it as a giant trash dump without paying the price.

  24. The Cato Institute is classified as a 501(c)(3) organization under U.S. Internal Revenue Code. For revenue, the Institute is largely dependent on private contributions and does not receive government funding.[117] 

    So it is not funded by taxes, by the public, but by fishy private interest individuals and groups…

  25. Michaels tells you the mean average of the temperature increase over the last 100 years. But he doesn't tell you that this temperature mostly increased over the last 40 years while from about 1900 to 1980 the temperature was pretty stable.
    And he doesn't tell you that that temperature increase gets worse and worse every year now.
    Also he does tell you only about the whole earth on mean average.
    That's like saying that on the mean average Switzerland is flat.

    Fact is that some regions get hotter while others stay more cool – and the increasing difference leads to the more violent phenomena of the system trying to get into thermal equilibrium again.

  26. If there is no global warming then look how many scientists lose federal funding . They would be doing away with their own jobs. That is why they doctor the reports.

  27. Who funds the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute?

    "The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank founded by Charles G. Koch and funded by the Koch brothers. "

    Who are the Koch Brothers?

    They make billions from coal and oil. Come on, people. Stop being stupid and easily manipulated. You're being lied to.

  28. Ha, yeah, when they don’t get the right data that they need to push their narrative…..in order to collect a climate tax…and restrict and control everything we do!

  29. So a retired biologist who is not actively studying current climate data gets hired by a conservative political organization to convince suckers that there is nothing to be concerned about…..got it. Suckers line up…(I know you will, that's why FOX news is so popular).

  30. Global warming is human induced . Anyone with half a brain can see the mass melting of ice caps . These currents affect temperature and heating and cooling. I wonder how much these garbage politicians/analysts got paid to decieve the people all for corporate greed. WAKE UP !!!!!

  31. Sometimes you can fool some of the people, sometimes you can fool all the people, but you can never fool all the people all the time. But climate change people are getting close.. it’s not real, do research, because if you read information on why it’s not real and you will understand.. it could be poor science but I doubt it..

  32. We need a new little ice age for about 10 years..lol love snow in Florida.. EPA knows they used false models just to get control of the carbon output to tax it..

  33. Understand that the political left knows that if governments can convince everyone that there is global warming, they can gain control of people!

  34. Where is all the liberal,sjw gasping, head exploding,freaking out comments? This educated man is telling us the TRUTH. It's all a hoax and certainly money or more taxes wont fix it! 12 years from now i will be enjoying a celebratory ribeye.YUMMY see ya then!

  35. This guy is funded buy oil and fossil fuel companies. He's a talking head. It's right there on his Wikipedia page. The purpose of this video is to manipulate Fox News watchers into thinking global warming is not a concern. If you can't see this, you are lost.

  36. What a dilemma! Should I believe him or the 97% of climate experts, all the science academies in developed countries, and virtually all the peer reviewed articles in respected science journals that believe climate change is occurring, is mainly human caused, and i a great threat to humanity.Also, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an organization composed of leading climate experts from many countries warned last October that we may have only until 2030 to make 'unprecedented changes' in order to have a chance to avert a climate catastrophe.
    Also, can we ignore facts on the ground? Every decade since the 1970s has been hotter than the previous decade, all 18 years in this century are among the 19 warmest years since temperature records have been kept, and 2014, 2015, and 2016 successively broke temperature records Also, glaciers and polar ice caps are melting, seas are rising, deserts are advancing, and there has been a significant increase in the frequency of heat waves, droughts, wildfires, storms, and floods.
    Atmospheric CO2 is at the highest level in human history.
    As former California governor Jerry Brown put it, "humanity is on a collision course with nature."

  37. Government colludes with elite to control weather globally. See HAARP installations all over world. The climate is heating up but the controlling/experimenting makes it much worse and will be the doom of us all. Search CHASING ICE on you tube. Advances in technology is going to be our extinction.

  38. hahaha…seriously…How much did fox pay for this moron? "the Russian model follows reality" ..Oops I forgot the "pretty much". Keep going, Fox…..Please keep this jibbering moron on Fox….Truly a fine representative.

  39. Just an attempt to usher in Socialism . . . Which leads to Communism and brings with it Dictatorship or NWO. If you dont like AMERICA THE WAY IT IS AND HAS ALWAYS BEEN
    . . . GET THE HELL OUT.

  40. I live in north Dakota USA. No global warming here! Still gets -20+ below zero, in the winter. Love me some global warming.

  41. This Youtube page is proof that U.S. needs free college and Medicare for All.

    Lots of uneducated comments/hosts and you don't know if it is mental or not.

  42. Always best to err on the side of safety…foolish to ignore a coming hurricane. Tipping point coming very soon as Alaska melt shows.

  43. Solar flares are one of the reasons why we have heat waves and the reason why we have 1 summer per year is because of how earth tilts during that period

  44. I WONDER HOW MUCH OF THE CHEMTRAILS THAT ARE BEING SPRAYED IN THE SKY HAS A BIG PART OF THE PROBLEM!!!!!!!!

  45. where does the amount of metal particulates being pored out over my head day and night by the planes making chem trails effect the weather and lord knows what else

  46. IF there is any man-made climate change it comes from habitat loss. In the summer, go to a park, and it is cool. Then leave the park and go to the streets, stand in the middle of the black bitumen, and it is warm. There is a real reason. It is the elephant in the living room. The solution for this that Pakistan, Ethiopia and many countries, now stuck in drought and overheating, is to plant billions and billions of trees. This is the solution. It works. All the noise on CO2, or whatever, is irrelevant. It is deliberate noise created to confuse, from both sides. Habitat loss – turning forests into grasslands, turning forests into paved and concreted areas, are a man-made contribution to any warming. And even if the planet is warming up for other reason, and it likely is, we still need a RIGHT solution. Trees are the natural and tried solution. They work in cooling down a region, and absorbing pollutants, including CO2. And if I am wrong, so what? Let's do it anyway. It can only be good.

  47. I watch several high flying jets, target cloud formations everyday, starting around sun up. It doesn't matter which day, these jets always show up and NO these are not passenger jets. Let's be clear of that. These jets have no set flight patterns, they criss-cross the sky, not heading towards any particular airport. Since the clouds are their real destination. I watch as clouds, which had been in the sky over night, some looked like they may even had some real moisture in them, quickly begin showing signs of breaking down and or dissolving, not long after these jets have released chemicals over them. Interesting also, using sun glasses, chemicals released directly in front of the sun, show in the clouds in that location, in green and pink colors, but not elsewhere. Different chemicals ? Lastly, the temperature changes from cool to bitingly hot. Our weather is being controlled. If they want a drought, they certainly can make one, as to the damages being caused at ground level, on trees, plants, streams, or on us physically after breathing them, who knows. Start watching…. start looking up.

  48. Socialist Democrat lies so they can tax you and distribute and accumulate your money that's what it's all about!

  49. NOAH, NASA, CRU, and the other mainstream sources for climate data have acknowledged fudging the temperature numbers. (Also search "climategate') They refer to it as "adjusting" or sometimes "homogenizing". Their adjustments are ALWAYS upward, unless its data for the past. The raw/unadjusted data (unlike the published data) actually indicates slight net global cooling since the late 90's, mostly in the southern hemisphere. Last winter Chicago had temps as cold as Antarctica. The left gave it a name (Polar Vortex) like it was something that could have happened any time. This is all consistent with the premise that our global temps are primarily controlled by the Sun. (Who could have ever guessed THAT?) Furthermore, we are coming up on a "Grand Solar Minimum" in which sun's radiation is predicted to decrease more, although not permanently.

  50. It’s a planet cyclic event…happened before will happen again…humans have only minutely advanced the occurrence. After warm will come another ice age and finally mankind will have its population reduced without a war…..unless the planet environmental change can be considered a 'war against humans'…

  51. Cato Institute is Libertarian. If anything would cut into a profit margin, you better believe this shill will be paid to say the opposite to protect it's donors bank accounts.

  52. Those so called scientists that "parameterized" their models should have their degree status revoked and be have all credentials stripped. They should be prosecuted for publishing and promulgating false data. Plain and simple. Put some of these coke bottle glasses pencil necks in jail and watch how fast these weasels change their tune. let them get the Epstein, Seth Rich, and Vince Foster treatment.

  53. Is THIS the main reason to scream "Russian Collusion" to throw off & deny the Russia climate models, hmm?! Remember the Green New Deal was not about global warming but to overhaul the 'entire' economy.

  54. If they could only put forth this much effort for things they could actually change. Drugs, Immigration,
    Taxes, Jobs, Homeless, Poverty, etc.

  55. Let us be clear on this!
    ❌CO2 is what humans and mammals exhale! That is carbon dioxide.
    CO is what combustion engines spew and cause pollution and toxic air. That is carbon monoxide
    They are really looking for a reason to reduce CO2 aka human population.

  56. Human Global Warming is happening. Fact. If you deny it, I hope you are getting paid because rich people are affected less by it.

  57. Apparently 9th of a Degree Means No More Food Growing in the Mid west US….pics are worth a thousand words, Funny how this whole topic eludes Human's when it's Soooo Simple , just keep Polluting (Here's a Clue) just keep Polluting ,Humans remind me of a frog in water that is being heated ,the frog doesn't know it either and ends up being cooked ,second clue , this is however a source of Enjoyment for me as i Watch Human's Blame everything else instead of themselves ,to Funny….

  58. This guy is lying, he receives money from fossil fuel companies to do so, I wish he was right but sadly he is not and he's robbing youngs of their futures. He doesn't care cause he is old I guess

  59. What a joke, totally unbiased working for The Cato Institute which is run by Koch Industries ( Petroleum, Chemicals… etc.) … you're a genie if you really trust this Guys opinion…

  60. How about chemtrail you dunce locking in all the heat heating up the planet the question is why is he hiding it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *